KNSB team championship
1977
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | MP | BP | ||
| 1 | Volmac Rotterdam | — | 5 | 6½ | 6½ | 7 | 6½ | 8½ | 6 | 7 | 6½ | 17 | 59½ |
| 2 | Elsevier VAS/ASC | 5 | — | 4½ | 5½ | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7½ | 6½ | 6 | 14 | 52 |
| 3 | Philidor Leeuwarden | 3½ | 5½ | — | 3½ | 5½ | 4½ | 7 | 5½ | 6 | 7* | 12 | 48 |
| 4 | Desisco Watergraafsmeer | 3½ | 4½ | 6½ | — | 6½ | 6½ | 7 | 6½ | 4 | 5 | 11 | 50 |
| 5 | Bussums SG | 3 | 4 | 4½ | 3½ | — | 6½ | 3 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 42½ |
| 6 | Charlois/Europoort | 3½ | 4 | 5½ | 3½ | 3½ | — | 6½ | 4½ | 6 | 5 | 7 | 42 |
| 7 | V Haarlemse S | 1½ | 5 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 3½ | — | 6 | 4½ | 5½ | 7 | 39 |
| 8 | DD Den Haag | 4 | 2½ | 4½ | 3½ | 4 | 5½ | 4 | — | 5½ | 7½ | 6 | 41 |
| 9 | Max Euwe/Morphy | 3 | 3½ | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 5½ | 4½ | — | 5½ | 6 | 39 |
| 10 | Philidor Leiden | 3½ | 4 | 3* | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4½ | 2½ | 4½ | — | 3 | 37 |
*: Schaakbulletin No.119/120 gives the result of this match as 7½-2½ for Leeuwarden. This is incompatible with the standings after round 3 as given in Schaakbulletin No.121. As they seem to be right for all other teams, I have assumed this match must really have ended 7-3 instead.
All information comes from pretty extensive coverage in [1]. This season of the official team championship of the Dutch Chess Federation was dominated by the heavily sponsored team of Rotterdam. Next to such players as Timman and Euwe, this team also included two Belgians. Their results were as follows (the ratings given are the FIDE ratings at the beginning of the competition):
| 1 | Bödicker, Robert | NED | 1 | |
| 3 | Schenk, André | NED | 0 | |
| 4 | Nijdam, Wim | NED | 1 | |
| 5 | van Maaren, Henk | NED | 1 | |
| 6 | van Dijk, A G | NED | 0 | |
| 7 | Visser | NED | 1 | |
| 8 | van der Lijn, Dick | NED | ½ | |
| 9 | Odink, Karel | NED | 1 | |
| IM | Boey, Jozef Martin | BEL | 2415 | 5½ |
| 5 | Piket, T | NED | 1 | |
| 8 | Sibbing, H A | NED | 1 | |
| 9 | van der Weide, Piet | NED | 2280 | 1 |
| Rooze, Jan | BEL | 2355 | 3 |
Wanted
- Almost all games.
- Some confirmation of the crosstable would be nice.
Sources
- Schaakbulletin Nos. 119/120 – 128
( ) - ( )
( )
( )