CE Antwerp summer tournament, Antwerp
1926
Preliminary 1: 1 Gottesdiener 4 2 Koltanowski 3 3 Censer 2½ 4-5 Cap & Tensen 2 6 Perfilief 1½
Preliminary 2: 1 Perlmutter 3½ 2-4 Prils, Van Stappen & Laub 3 5 Kornreich 2½ 6 Van Elsaecker 0
Preliminary 3: 1 J. Dunkelblum 4 2 A. Dunkelblum 3½ 3 Embrechts 2½ 4 Feinstein 2½ 5 Zentler 1½ 6 Backer 1
Final | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Tot | ||
1 | Censer, Isidore | BEL | – | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 5 |
2 | Dunkelblum, Arthur | POL | ½ | – | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4½ |
3 | Koltanowski, George | BEL | 0 | ½ | – | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3½ |
4 | Van Stappen | BEL | 0 | ½ | 1 | – | ½ | 1 | 0 | 3 |
5 | Dunkelblum, Joseph | POL | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | – | ½ | 1 | 2½ |
6 | Embrechts | BEL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | – | 1 | 1½ |
7 | Prils, Oscar | BEL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | 1 |
This crosstable was extracted from results in [1], which also gives one game. [2] gives one more game. The result of the game between Prils and A. Dunkelblum was not mentioned in [1], but the final standings are. Gottesdiener (0 against Koltanowski) and Perlmutter (½ against Censer) played one game in the final (as far as I know) but then dropped out of the tournament. The final standings from the preliminaries are taken from [3]. I don’t know whether Prils and Van Stappen edged out Laub on tie-breaks or whether play-offs were played.
[1] gives the winner’s name as Ensel, but as Censer qualified from the preliminaries and as he would go on to play under a pseudonym later on, it seems probable that it was him.
Wanted
- Almost all games.
- The first names of Van Stappen and Embrechts.
Sources
- G. Koltanowski’s column in De Schelde
- De Standaard 31/08/1926
- Le Soir 19/06/1926
( )